Saturday, March 28, 2009

Harun Yahya's Dream Recording Device

Harun Yahya, author of the lengthy creationist tome The Atlas of Creation, is starting to seem like a parody of a creationist with his vilification of Richard Dawkins, but even I admit that this is pretty funny.

9 comments:

JAMSHED MOIDU said...

what nonsense you are posting........

JAMSHED MOIDU said...

your leader Mr Dawkin is adapting himself not to debate with Harun Yahya.....because Richard is not intellectually FIT to debate with him.....ONLY THE FITTEST SURVIVE, Mr RICHARD IS 'MUTATED' ALREADY AND HE IS NO MORE USEFUL TO YOU............

JAMSHED MOIDU said...

how much you struggle to make your pagan religion ( DARWINISM) alive , you can never achieve your result BUDDY.........

Anonymous said...

Jamhead, have you ever thought about becoming a comedian? It would be an occupation that totally suits your ability to make people laugh at you. You come across like a Monty Python character...

HEY YOU DAWKINIST I WEE IN your general DIRECTION!!!!


By the way Jamhead, your beloved prophet Harun Yoyo couldn't debate his way out of a paper bag. He is too busy pleasuring his male cell mates in prison.
Doesn't that make you envious? Wouldn't you like to cosy up to homoerotic Harun too Jamhead?


Shadowjack:)

Silentside said...

Following the revelation of 100 million fossils all proving the fact of Creation, the atheist Richard Dawkins retreated into a profound silence. He saw and was alarmed how these fossils that Darwinists had tried to conceal for so many years had totally demolished Darwinism. He then watched, in a state of terrible panic, as the Atlas of Creation, in which many of these fossils were pictured, spread across the world. He exhibited the same panic in the face of how people began to abandon Darwinism en masse. So much so that he had no compunction about calling his own countrymen "ignorant" when it emerged that 75% of people in Britain, his home country, say that "Allah (God) created living things." He commenced crude attacks on the Atlas of Creation and Adnan Oktar. He imagined that this technique, rather than science, would work to his advantage, but he was wrong.


The claim regarding the ban on Dawkins' Internet site can be clarified as follows:

Judicial authorities’ decision to ban Dawkins’ site is not related to the personal claims Dawkins expressed in his site. It is evident that Dawkins expressed these claims in a spirit of panic, out of the pitiful situation resulting from the collapse of Darwinism. The official verdict of the ban taken by the Court is due to the libelous comments made against the author. Mr. Adnan Oktar’s attorneys warned the administrators of the site about these comments, but because these warnings were not taken into consideration and the necessary precautions were not taken, there existed no way other than litigating. In the face of libelous words, Turkish courts found the demand justified and banned the site. Consequently the verdict of the ban of Dawkins’ site is an official one given by the judges in the face of explicit evidence. Surely nobody has the right to insult any other person by any means. The verdict in question is an extremely important and necessary decision that protects the rights of all people and is taken for this purpose.

Silentside said...

Richard Dawkins, a most ardent supporter of Darwinism, has long accounted for the perfect creation of the universe in terms of the theory of evolution, which has lately suffered a global collapse. In his recent writings and interviews, however, Dawkins has started to express that "life cannot form by chance." It is an absence of sense and reason to support evolution on one hand and to state that life cannot come about by chance on the other. That is due to the fact that according to the theory of evolution, which Dawkins supports, the existence of life is based on entirely random coincidences.

Dawkins has realized that he can get nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical impasse as he basically claims that "evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences." What he should realize is that demagogy no longer works.

Anonymous said...

"Dawkins has realized that he can get nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical impasse as he basically claims that "evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences." What he should realize is that demagogy no longer works."

Instead of attacking a straw man why don't you read The Greatest Show on Earth by Dawkins?

It will show you why scientists reject your childish myths in favour of evolution, for which there is plenty of evidence (Lenski et al).
Hahoo Yahoo's ignorance is a fantasy, so wise up and get a proper education in science, Silentside.

Thomachan said...

@ Anonymous.

I'd recommend you to read atleast one page of Harun Yahya's books, without prejudice. He refutes everything about Darwinism right from their very foundations. That is the reason why Darwinism has now collapsed worldwide. All that is the left are the rantings of some prejudiced people who don't want to admit their ideological defeat.

Harun Yahya has demolished Darwinism in a scholarly manner by producing hundreds of books, movies and websites with concrete documentation. Anyone without prejudice reading them gets the truth of the matter.

About Dawkins,
If you read any of the books by Harun Yahya on evolution, you can clearly see the irrationality expressed in Dawkins's latest book.

See this beautiful website
www.replytodawkins.com

Anonymous said...

Thomachan, I have read some of Yahya's books without prejudice, but with knowledge. And Yahya's books showed me that Yahya can't even distinguish between different species, and knows nothing about science.
Perhaps it is time for you to read Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth without prejudice and with your brain engaged. To read some of this intelligent book go to:

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/4217-extract-from-chapter-one-of-the-greatest-show-on-earth